<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So you think you can spot a good 3D model?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/so-you-think-you-can-spot-a-good-3d-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/so-you-think-you-can-spot-a-good-3d-model/</link>
	<description>Community for Entertainment Artists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razor</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2012/05/so-you-think-you-can-spot-a-good-3d-model/#comment-27979</link>
		<dc:creator>Razor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=37512#comment-27979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TurboSquid is the perfect example of what happens when, out of pure greed, you accept any crappy model to add to your volume of sales. It&#039;s like a bull rush of garage sale crap hoping to make a buck off of most of the crap.

This voting game will be ineffectual at discerning quality of hidden functionality like rigs, topology, textures/UVs, animation, and optional format quality. Who cares if it&#039;s likable from an opinionated &quot;game&quot; standpoint if the rig sucks, the topology is all messed up, or the optional format has problems and needs hours of clean up.

TurboSquid recent efforts are nothing more than an admission of greedy mistakes and now they are trying to somewhat fix the highly over-priced, poor quality crap they&#039;ve been (and still are) dishing out all of these years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TurboSquid is the perfect example of what happens when, out of pure greed, you accept any crappy model to add to your volume of sales. It&#8217;s like a bull rush of garage sale crap hoping to make a buck off of most of the crap.</p>
<p>This voting game will be ineffectual at discerning quality of hidden functionality like rigs, topology, textures/UVs, animation, and optional format quality. Who cares if it&#8217;s likable from an opinionated &#8220;game&#8221; standpoint if the rig sucks, the topology is all messed up, or the optional format has problems and needs hours of clean up.</p>
<p>TurboSquid recent efforts are nothing more than an admission of greedy mistakes and now they are trying to somewhat fix the highly over-priced, poor quality crap they&#8217;ve been (and still are) dishing out all of these years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
