<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Video: Nvidia talks new GPUs, iray, cloud computing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/09/video-nvidia-talks-new-gpus-iray-cloud-computing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/09/video-nvidia-talks-new-gpus-iray-cloud-computing/</link>
	<description>Community for Entertainment Artists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/09/video-nvidia-talks-new-gpus-iray-cloud-computing/#comment-7117</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 01:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=12527#comment-7117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Undeniably exciting.  It will be interesting to see what the limitations are that they haven&#039;t mentioned.  All the new renderers sound good, until suddenly there&#039;s no supported displacement, or only raytraced shadows, or volumetrics or particles won&#039;t work in it, or you have to have version X Nvidia with CUDA X which isn&#039;t available yet, or accessing a cloud requires a monthly fee (speculatively, I can&#039;t see how it can remain free given today&#039;s economics), and so on.  So far I think VRay 2 looks more promising than Iray, mostly because mentalray has a more fussy / antiquated scene preparation and Iray is a growth from it.  Hopefully the reality lives up to the exciting talk, but you know, they talked up QuickSilver too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undeniably exciting.  It will be interesting to see what the limitations are that they haven&#8217;t mentioned.  All the new renderers sound good, until suddenly there&#8217;s no supported displacement, or only raytraced shadows, or volumetrics or particles won&#8217;t work in it, or you have to have version X Nvidia with CUDA X which isn&#8217;t available yet, or accessing a cloud requires a monthly fee (speculatively, I can&#8217;t see how it can remain free given today&#8217;s economics), and so on.  So far I think VRay 2 looks more promising than Iray, mostly because mentalray has a more fussy / antiquated scene preparation and Iray is a growth from it.  Hopefully the reality lives up to the exciting talk, but you know, they talked up QuickSilver too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: leviathansh</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/09/video-nvidia-talks-new-gpus-iray-cloud-computing/#comment-7102</link>
		<dc:creator>leviathansh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 13:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=12527#comment-7102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prefieron el Vray RT no tiene favoritismos con Nvidia y me parece mas confiable que el Iray. Que siendo parte del mental ray no me extrañaria que lo dejaran a medias y sin innovaciones como han hecho los ultimos años en autodesk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prefieron el Vray RT no tiene favoritismos con Nvidia y me parece mas confiable que el Iray. Que siendo parte del mental ray no me extrañaria que lo dejaran a medias y sin innovaciones como han hecho los ultimos años en autodesk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nvidia talks new GPUs, iray, cloud computing &#124; nzdan</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/09/video-nvidia-talks-new-gpus-iray-cloud-computing/#comment-7099</link>
		<dc:creator>Nvidia talks new GPUs, iray, cloud computing &#124; nzdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 05:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=12527#comment-7099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] my GPU focus as of late check out this interesting post, or skip directly to the video as shown in the link [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my GPU focus as of late check out this interesting post, or skip directly to the video as shown in the link [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
