<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 3 Ultimate Starship Enterprise Designs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/</link>
	<description>Community for Entertainment Artists</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 03:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: whiner</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/#comment-28376</link>
		<dc:creator>whiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=6712#comment-28376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually they bounced my balls, and tickled my pickle at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually they bounced my balls, and tickled my pickle at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/#comment-10153</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 07:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=6712#comment-10153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kind of material would a starship build on? Working on ion engines hey it&#039;s a begining using super mag fields sorry classified.  Working on prottypes not thoery.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of material would a starship build on? Working on ion engines hey it&#8217;s a begining using super mag fields sorry classified.  Working on prottypes not thoery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shygirl</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/#comment-5635</link>
		<dc:creator>Shygirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=6712#comment-5635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Snafu are you kidding me. You actually liked the Enterprise D over the Enterprise E? I never liked the D. One the scale was off. I never got the felling that it was a big as they said. Two, I found the curve angle of the connection to the warp nacelles strange. I liked the return to the V configuration of E better. Enterprise E looked far more menacing looking posture.  I honest felt that the Enterprise E was more of a battleship. Based on the absents of children during the evacuation scenes in ST:1st C. and the sleeker saucer section design. I can only assume that the families allowed on the Galaxy Class were no longer a part of the Sovereign Class. Something Capt. Picard said was a mistake. I felt that too. How are crewmembers gong to concentrate during an emergency if they are worried about family member after a report of a damaged section of the ship. No the Enterprise E was worthy of the title Flagship of Starfleet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snafu are you kidding me. You actually liked the Enterprise D over the Enterprise E? I never liked the D. One the scale was off. I never got the felling that it was a big as they said. Two, I found the curve angle of the connection to the warp nacelles strange. I liked the return to the V configuration of E better. Enterprise E looked far more menacing looking posture.  I honest felt that the Enterprise E was more of a battleship. Based on the absents of children during the evacuation scenes in ST:1st C. and the sleeker saucer section design. I can only assume that the families allowed on the Galaxy Class were no longer a part of the Sovereign Class. Something Capt. Picard said was a mistake. I felt that too. How are crewmembers gong to concentrate during an emergency if they are worried about family member after a report of a damaged section of the ship. No the Enterprise E was worthy of the title Flagship of Starfleet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snafu</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/#comment-3856</link>
		<dc:creator>Snafu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=6712#comment-3856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ultimately, nothing beats the refit Enterprise as shown in ST:TMP: after so many low-contrasty grey-painted kitbashes, something as simple as having cruiser/airplane-like self-illumination in the darkness of space and playing with flares (Trumbull true to form. JJ Abrams&#039; is the hyperbolical conclusion) was such a revelation. That, and a paintjob to die for.

I don&#039;t like the E-E that much. It&#039;s such a step backwards from the E-D. Too chunky and bloated in places, the textures a cheap mess, and actually rather not quite form-follows-function at all (the saucer&#039;s underside, design-wise, makes no sense. Paradoxically, the E-D is more practical a design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately, nothing beats the refit Enterprise as shown in ST:TMP: after so many low-contrasty grey-painted kitbashes, something as simple as having cruiser/airplane-like self-illumination in the darkness of space and playing with flares (Trumbull true to form. JJ Abrams&#8217; is the hyperbolical conclusion) was such a revelation. That, and a paintjob to die for.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the E-E that much. It&#8217;s such a step backwards from the E-D. Too chunky and bloated in places, the textures a cheap mess, and actually rather not quite form-follows-function at all (the saucer&#8217;s underside, design-wise, makes no sense. Paradoxically, the E-D is more practical a design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.cgchannel.com/2010/04/the-3-ultimate-starship-enterprise-designs/#comment-3723</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 22:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cgchannel.com/?p=6712#comment-3723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WHOA, What about ST the movie  Redux  NCC-1701-A  ,for my vote the best of the old and new designs,Now THATS a space rod!( the STNG was also a model)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHOA, What about ST the movie  Redux  NCC-1701-A  ,for my vote the best of the old and new designs,Now THATS a space rod!( the STNG was also a model)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
